What if discrimination is not just about group identity, but also a much more fundamental process in the brain?
The research found that both men and women are talking less nowadays. Perhaps technology is to blame?
Our values shape how we see our friends and family — but not in the way you think.
The study showed 128 young women personality profiles of various men.
The study showed 128 young women personality profiles of various men.
Extraverts with stable, or non-neurotic personalities are particularly attractive.
However, both of these personality traits also help explain the attraction of the ‘bad boy’ to women, who also tends to be laid-back and extraverted.
Narcissist and psychopaths are seen as both extraverted and having stable, non-neurotic personalities, the study found.
Both of these contribute to the attractiveness of men with ‘dark triad’ personalities.
The ‘dark triad’ of personality factors includes narcissism and psychopathy, along with Machiavellianism.
The study’s authors write:
“Women, particularly in respect of short-term mating, may be attracted to ‘bad boys’, possessing confidence, hard-headedness and an inclination to risk-take – all accurate descriptors of Dark Triad [DT] men; all attractive to women.”
Another explanation for the attractiveness of bad boys could be their superficial charm, the authors write:
“Women may be responding to DT men’s ability to ‘sell themselves’; a useful tactic in a co-evolutionary ‘arms race’ in which men convince women to pursue the former’s preferred sexual strategy.
This ability may derive from a ‘used-car dealer’ ability to charm and manipulate, and DT-associated traits such as assertiveness.
Men with a DT personality are undoubtedly well-placed to successfully implement such a strategy.”
The conclusions come from a study in which 128 young women were shown personality profiles of various men.
One was designed to be high in dark triad personality factors.
The results showed that women saw the ‘bad boy’ as more attractive, when appearance was held constant.
Here is the authors’ quick description of the dark triad personality traits:
“Narcissism is defined by a sense of entitlement, dominance and a grandiose self-view.
Machiavellians are interpersonally duplicitous, insincere and extraverted.
Psychopathy consists of callousness, a lack of empathy, and antisocial, erratic behaviour.”
The study was published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences (Carter et al., 2014).
Explore why social validation is crucial for our emotional well-being and how it influences our actions in society.
Social validation is a psychological phenomenon where people seek approval and acceptance from others to shape their identity and decisions.
Social validation refers to the human tendency to seek recognition and approval from others.
It is deeply embedded in human nature and influences decision-making, self-perception, and confidence.
From childhood, people learn that approval from parents, teachers, and peers leads to positive reinforcement.
As adults, this need for validation extends into social interactions, workplaces, and digital platforms.
People are social creatures who thrive on connection and approval.
Social validation activates the brain’s reward system, releasing dopamine, which creates a feeling of pleasure.
This neurological response makes validation-seeking behaviour highly reinforcing.
The concept of social proof, introduced by psychologist Robert Cialdini, explains how people look to others to determine correct behaviour, especially in uncertain situations.
This is why people often follow trends, adopt popular opinions, or seek likes and comments on social media.
Social validation has existed since the earliest human societies.
In tribal communities, acceptance by the group was crucial for survival.
Exclusion meant a loss of resources, protection, and social bonds, making validation a necessity.
As civilisations developed, social hierarchies emerged, and validation became linked to status, reputation, and influence.
Today, social validation is not just about survival but also about personal and professional success.
The rise of social media has amplified social validation.
Platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok are designed to encourage validation through likes, shares, and comments.
People often measure their self-worth based on social media engagement, leading to both positive and negative consequences.
Social validation is not inherently negative.
When balanced, it can lead to growth, motivation, and stronger relationships.
While social validation has benefits, excessive dependence on it can lead to emotional distress and unhealthy behaviours.
Social validation varies across cultures, shaped by societal norms, traditions, and values.
In collectivist cultures, such as those in East Asia, social approval plays a significant role in decision-making.
Conformity is often encouraged, and individuals seek validation from family and community.
In individualistic cultures, like those in Western societies, personal achievement and self-expression are emphasised, and validation is often linked to personal success rather than group acceptance.
Achieving a balance between seeking social validation and maintaining self-worth is essential for mental well-being.
Strategies to cultivate a healthy mindset include focusing on self-validation, setting personal standards, and reducing dependence on external approval.
As digital interactions continue to evolve, social validation will remain a significant part of human behaviour.
Emerging technologies, such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence, may further shape validation-seeking behaviours.
Future trends may involve new ways of measuring social approval, potentially leading to deeper discussions about authenticity, self-worth, and mental health.
Social validation is a natural and powerful force in human behaviour.
While seeking approval can be beneficial, it is crucial to maintain a healthy balance and avoid excessive dependence on external validation.
By fostering self-awareness and self-acceptance, individuals can navigate social validation in a way that enhances their well-being and personal growth.
This common behaviour spreads like wildfire in the office.
This common behaviour spreads like wildfire in the office.
Rudeness in the workplace is contagious.
Experiencing rude behaviour makes people more likely to expect it later on.
That expectation then causes people to behave more rudely to others.
The conclusions come from a psychology study of graduate students who were practising negotiation with their classmates.
The researchers found that people who negotiated with someone rated as rude were more likely to be rated as rude by someone else later on.
The effects held even when there was a week between the first and second negotiation.
Mr Trevor Foulk, one of the study’s authors, said:
“When you experience rudeness, it makes rudeness more noticeable.
You’ll see more rudeness even if it’s not there.”
Rudeness spreads so easily partly because people are remarkably tolerant of it, said Mr Foulk:
“Part of the problem is that we are generally tolerant of these behaviors, but they’re actually really harmful.
Rudeness has an incredibly powerful negative effect on the workplace.”
Rudeness also spreads easily because it primes our brains to detect rudeness.
In a further study, people who’d witnessed a rude interaction were quicker to pick out rude words from a list.
“That tells us that rudeness will flavor the way you interpret ambiguous cues.”
In other words: immediately after experiencing rudeness, you tend to be on the lookout for it.
Mr Foulk believes employers should take everyday incivilities more seriously:
“You might go your whole career and not experience abuse or aggression in the workplace, but rudeness also has a negative effect on performance.
It isn’t something you can just turn your back on.
It matters.”
The study was published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (Foulk et al., 2015).
The unconscious bias that shapes how people view poverty.
These 10 hidden truths about synchrony reveal the science behind your relationships.
Trying to sound attractive is easier for women than men.
Trying to sound attractive is easier for women than men.
Speaking slowly makes people sound more intelligent.A lower tone also makes both sexes sound more attractive.Women asked to talk in a more attractive way for the study automatically lowered the pitch of their voice and made it sound more breathy — which men find attractive.While women had no trouble changing their voice to make it sound more sexy, men found it harder.To sound more attractive, both sexes also speak slower, the authors write:“…both sexes in our sample slowed their speech in comparison to their normal speech when trying to sound attractive/sexy…Perhaps the slowing of one’s voice in a mating scenario is an attempt to convey approachability, as decreased speaking rate was found to increase the benevolence ratings of a speaker.”Women, though, when they listened to men trying to sound attractive, were not convinced.When women tried to sound sexier, it was more convincing.Dr Susan Hughes, the study’s first author, said:
“This ability may be due to culture and cuts across cultures and time.There is a stereotype of what is a sexual voice in our culture — a low, breathy voice.”The study had people trying to intentionally change their voices to embody different traits.They tried to sound more sexy, confident, intelligent and dominant.Dr Hughes said men found it difficult to sound sexy:
“In fact, although not significantly, it got a bit worse when men tried to sound sexy.”Both sexes, though, had no problem sounding more intelligent and more dominant.The researchers explained the changes people made:
“…both sexes slowed their speech and women lowered their pitch and had greater vocal hoarseness.Both sexes raised their pitch and spoke louder to sound dominant and women had less vocal hoarseness.”Women, though, found it hard to sound more confident.The reason for the differences could be down to practice, the researchers think.Men do not really focus on making their voice sound sexier, but women do.The study was published in Journal of Nonverbal Behavior (Hughes et al., 2014).
Uncover the brain mechanisms behind social cognition and how culture shapes our perception, empathy, and social judgments.
Social cognition refers to the processes that underlie our ability to perceive, interpret, and respond to social information.
Social cognition encompasses the mental operations involved in understanding social interactions.
It is a foundational aspect of human psychology, essential for successful social functioning.
Everyday actions, from making eye contact to interpreting sarcasm, rely on complex social cognitive processes.
This field continues to grow, offering insights into improving human connections and addressing social challenges.
Social cognition involves several interconnected processes that allow individuals to navigate their social world effectively.
Key processes include:
These processes are not isolated but interact dynamically.
For instance, perceiving social cues relies on prior knowledge stored in memory, and retrieval of past experiences can be influenced by biases or emotional states.
Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into how social judgments are formed and how misinterpretations can lead to conflict.
Various theories and models have been developed to explain social cognition.
Among the most prominent are:
Each of these models highlights different aspects of social thinking.
Attribution theory, for example, sheds light on why misunderstandings occur in relationships when intentions are misattributed.
Schema theory explains why first impressions can be difficult to change, as new information is often filtered through pre-existing beliefs.
Understanding the brain mechanisms behind social cognition reveals its complexity.
Key elements include:
Recent research has shown that mirror neurons, located in various brain regions, are crucial for empathy and imitation.
These neurons activate both when an individual performs an action and when they observe someone else performing the same action, facilitating understanding of others’ intentions and feelings.
Social cognition develops throughout life but undergoes significant changes during childhood and adolescence.
Factors influencing its development include:
During adolescence, increased cognitive maturity allows for more complex social reasoning.
However, this period also presents challenges as developing self-awareness can heighten social anxiety and sensitivity to peer evaluation.
Programmes designed to enhance social and emotional learning (SEL) are increasingly recognised for their role in fostering positive social development.
Deficits or alterations in social cognition are linked to several mental health conditions.
Examples include:
Effective interventions targeting social cognition can improve outcomes for these conditions.
In ASD, therapies focusing on emotion recognition and perspective-taking have shown promise.
Similarly, social skills training for individuals with schizophrenia can enhance social functioning and quality of life.
The rise of digital communication has influenced social cognitive processes.
Notable impacts include:
Excessive screen time has also been linked to reduced face-to-face interactions, potentially impacting the development of social skills in children and adolescents.
Strategies to balance online and offline interactions are essential for maintaining healthy social cognitive functioning.
Social cognition varies significantly across cultures.
Examples of differences include:
Understanding these differences is crucial for effective cross-cultural communication.
Misinterpretations often arise when behaviours are judged through the lens of one’s own cultural framework rather than being viewed contextually.
Social cognitive skills evolve over a lifetime, with notable changes in later adulthood.
Key points include:
Despite age-related challenges, older adults often possess superior emotional regulation and conflict resolution skills.
Programmes focusing on lifelong learning and social engagement can enhance cognitive resilience.
Enhancing social cognition benefits individuals with impairments and the general population.
Effective interventions include:
Emerging technologies, such as virtual reality, are being used to simulate social scenarios, providing immersive experiences that help individuals practice and refine their social skills in a controlled environment.
Social cognition influences many aspects of daily life.
Key applications include:
In the workplace, social cognitive skills contribute to effective collaboration, conflict resolution, and emotional intelligence.
Employers increasingly value these competencies as essential for team-based success.
Research on social cognition employs diverse methodologies.
Common approaches include:
Longitudinal studies are particularly valuable for understanding how social cognition develops and changes over time.
Combining behavioural and neuroscientific data offers a comprehensive view of social cognitive functioning.
Social cognition has evolved from early philosophical inquiry to a scientific discipline.
Key milestones include:
The integration of neuroscience and psychology in recent decades has further enriched the understanding of social cognition, bridging gaps between biological mechanisms and behavioural outcomes.
Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.
