Discover why stories of true crime are so engaging to people, particularly women.
Keep reading with a Membership
• Read members-only articles
• Adverts removed
• Cancel at any time
• 14 day money-back guarantee for new members
Discover why stories of true crime are so engaging to people, particularly women.
Explore how theta waves facilitate deep relaxation and meditation, enhancing mental well-being and creativity.
Theta waves are low-frequency brain waves that play a critical role in various mental and emotional states.
Theta waves are a type of brainwave associated with a frequency range of approximately 4 to 8 Hz.
They lie between delta waves (slowest) and alpha waves (moderate frequency) on the brainwave spectrum.
These waves occur when the brain is in a deeply relaxed state, making them particularly significant for meditation, creativity, and certain stages of sleep.
Theta waves are linked to subconscious activity and are believed to facilitate the retrieval of deeply stored memories and insights.
This makes them an essential component of self-reflection and personal growth.
Theta waves are known for their link to deep relaxation, meditation, and heightened creativity.
When theta wave activity increases, the brain enters a state often described as dreamy or meditative.
This state is common during light sleep or when a person is deeply relaxed but not fully unconscious.
Theta waves also contribute to intuitive thinking, where the mind makes connections without deliberate reasoning.
They are often associated with moments of inspiration, where creative or problem-solving breakthroughs occur unexpectedly.
Additionally, theta waves play a role in emotional regulation, helping individuals process emotions and achieve a calm, balanced mindset.
Enhanced relaxation and stress reduction: Increased theta activity correlates with a sense of calm and reduced stress.
Improved learning and memory: Research shows that theta waves play a role in memory encoding and recall.
Creativity and problem-solving: Many creative thinkers and problem solvers report breakthroughs while in theta-dominant brain states.
Emotional healing: Theta waves facilitate introspection and deeper emotional release.
Greater access to intuition: Intuitive insights and gut feelings often emerge in theta states.
Expanded spiritual awareness: Theta waves are linked to experiences of higher consciousness in meditative and spiritual practices.
Theta waves are prominent during the lighter stages of sleep.
They occur during REM sleep, contributing to vivid dreams and memory consolidation.
Theta activity also appears during brief drowsy moments before falling asleep or upon waking.
During non-REM sleep, theta waves help the brain organise and store information gathered during waking hours.
Sleep studies reveal that theta wave patterns are integral to the formation of long-term memories.
Disruptions to theta activity can affect sleep quality, reducing the restorative benefits of sleep.
Theta states are closely tied to creative processes.
Many artists and innovators report experiencing flashes of insight and unique ideas during moments of deep relaxation or meditation.
Theta waves encourage non-linear thinking and open up pathways to novel solutions.
Examples of creativity linked to theta states include:
Musicians often find theta-induced inspiration when improvising or composing.
Artists may use theta wave stimulation to break through creative blocks and discover fresh perspectives.
Theta waves also facilitate mind-wandering, which fosters divergent thinking—a key aspect of innovation and creativity.
Theta wave technology is advancing in areas like virtual reality and wearable devices.
Applications include:
Emerging technologies may soon allow more precise modulation of theta waves for therapeutic uses.
Research is ongoing to explore how theta wave modulation can benefit cognitive rehabilitation and mental health treatments.
Theta wave-like states have been recognised in spiritual and meditative traditions for centuries.
In ancient practices, theta brainwave states were often accessed through deep meditation, rhythmic drumming, or chanting.
Shamanic rituals across many cultures sought to achieve altered states of consciousness, resembling modern understandings of theta dominance.
Theta states were believed to foster intuition, connection to higher wisdom, and healing powers.
The use of sound and repetitive movements in indigenous cultures aligns with theta frequency stimulation techniques.
Modern practitioners of yoga nidra, a deep relaxation practice, often experience theta waves as they move into profound states of calm.
While enhancing theta wave activity offers numerous benefits, some risks and considerations include:
Theta dominance can also impair cognitive performance in situations where analytical thinking is required.
It is essential to balance theta activity with other brainwave patterns for optimal mental performance.
Theta waves are a subject of ongoing scientific research and debate.
Some controversies include:
Another debate focuses on whether increased theta wave activity improves intuition and decision-making or merely promotes relaxation.
Further studies are required to clarify the relationship between theta waves and emotional intelligence.
Theta waves are naturally more dominant in children than adults.
Young brains display higher levels of theta activity, which aligns with rapid learning and imaginative play.
As individuals age, beta wave activity (associated with focused thinking) becomes more prominent.
However, theta waves remain crucial for adults during relaxation, meditation, and sleep.
Theta activity in elderly individuals may help protect against cognitive decline by supporting neuroplasticity.
Practices that enhance theta waves could contribute to improved mental health and resilience across the lifespan.
Theta waves are a powerful and versatile brainwave frequency with profound effects on relaxation, learning, creativity, and emotional health.
Understanding how to harness and balance theta wave activity can lead to a more relaxed, insightful, and creative life.
Incorporating theta-inducing practices into daily routines offers an accessible way to boost well-being and unlock greater potential.
‘Live With Purpose’ is a course filled with practical tools to help you uncover and deepen your sense of meaning in life.
Introducing Live With Purpose, PsyBlog’s fifth online course, after Accept Yourself, The Anxiety Plan, Spark and Activate, all of which are included in the Premium Membership.
Live With Purpose explores the science behind finding meaning in life, including 15 strategies for transforming your well-being, relationships and overall sense of fulfilment.
With a Premium Membership you can now access the whole of the Live With Purpose course.
A Premium Membership also gives you access to all members-only articles, premium content and other courses, as they become available.
If you are asking the big questions, like “Why am I here?” or “What brings me true happiness?” then you are on the journey toward a more meaningful life.
Live With Purpose is your guide to that journey—a course grounded in psychology and filled with practical tools to help you uncover and deepen your sense of purpose.
In this course, we go beyond surface-level happiness.
True purpose does not come from momentary pleasures; it comes from engaging with life’s deeper challenges.
It is about developing a lifestyle that leaves you feeling resilient, even in the face of setbacks.
The search for meaning is one of the most fulfilling endeavours if you embrace it fully.
This course is designed to make the search for meaning practical, accessible and impactful.
To help you do so, the course covers:
Along the way, the course reveals:
Ready to embrace a life that feels rich with meaning and purpose?
Enroll in Live With Purpose: 15 Strategies For A More Meaningful Life (Course) today.
Explore the Asch conformity experiment, a pivotal study in social psychology that reveals how group pressure impacts individual judgement.
The Asch conformity experiment, conducted by Solomon Asch in the 1950s, is a cornerstone of social psychology.
The Asch conformity experiment was designed to measure the influence of group pressure on individual judgement.
Solomon Asch set out to investigate whether individuals would conform to a group’s consensus, even when it was obviously incorrect.
This simple yet profound study demonstrated how social influence could override an individual’s perception of reality.
The setup involved groups of participants who were asked to complete a simple perceptual task.
Unbeknownst to the real participant, the other members of the group were confederates instructed to provide pre-determined, often incorrect answers.
This allowed researchers to observe how the real participant would respond to the majority’s incorrect consensus.
Asch’s experiment was methodologically straightforward but meticulously controlled.
Participants were presented with two cards: one with a single vertical line and another with three lines of varying lengths.
The task was to identify which of the three lines matched the length of the single line.
While the answer was unambiguous, the majority of participants were confederates who deliberately provided incorrect answers on certain trials.
The real participant, seated towards the end of the group, heard the incorrect answers before giving their own.
This created a powerful situation in which the individual faced the choice of agreeing with the group or trusting their own judgement.
Asch conducted the experiment with multiple variations to assess the factors influencing conformity.
These included altering the group size, the unanimity of the majority, and the presence of dissenters.
The results of the Asch conformity experiment revealed striking insights into human behaviour.
Approximately 75 percent of participants conformed to the incorrect majority at least once.
On average, participants conformed to the group’s incorrect response in one-third of the critical trials.
When asked why they conformed, participants provided varying explanations.
Some genuinely doubted their own perception, believing the majority to be correct.
Others knew their answers were wrong but conformed to avoid conflict or rejection.
Interestingly, when at least one other group member provided the correct answer, conformity rates significantly decreased.
This highlighted the importance of dissent in breaking the power of group pressure.
Several psychological factors underpinned the conformity observed in Asch’s experiment.
These factors are not unique to Asch’s experiment but are prevalent in everyday group dynamics.
Despite its fascinating findings, the Asch experiment faced several criticisms.
Despite these critiques, the experiment remains highly influential in understanding group behaviour and social influence.
The findings of the Asch experiment are as relevant today as they were in the 1950s.
Modern contexts, such as social media and digital communication, amplify group influence and conformity.
The “Asch effect” can be observed in echo chambers, where individuals align their opinions with dominant group narratives to avoid conflict or ostracism.
In workplaces, groupthink can hinder creativity and lead to poor decision-making when dissenting voices are silenced.
Understanding the dynamics of conformity is essential for fostering environments that encourage critical thinking and diversity of thought.
The insights from the Asch experiment have far-reaching applications across various domains.
The Asch experiment also offers valuable lessons for individuals navigating group dynamics.
The Asch conformity experiment remains a landmark study in social psychology, shedding light on the powerful influence of group pressure.
While the findings revealed human susceptibility to conformity, they also underscored the importance of independent thinking and dissent.
In today’s interconnected world, where social and digital influences are pervasive, the lessons from Asch’s work are more relevant than ever.
By understanding and addressing the dynamics of conformity, we can foster environments that value individuality and critical thought.
Is 50 old? Young people have the most skewed perceptions about aging.
Is 50 old? Young people have the most skewed perceptions about aging.
Children and young adults want to live until their early 90s, but those approaching middle age are less optimistic, a study finds.
People in their 30s and 40s want to live the shortest period, falling to a low of 88-years-old, on average.
Among people over 50, the ideal number of years starts to rise again.
Those in their 80s say they would like to live to an average of 93.
The study revealed a fascinating array of results about people’s perception of age.
It showed the well-known phenomenon that young people think anyone over about 30-years-old is a dinosaur.
They believed that middle age starts at 30 and old age begins at 50.
Dr William Chopik, the study’s first author, said:
“I find it interesting that there’s a ton of people who have skewed perceptions about aging – mostly young adults.
I think the most interesting finding of this study is that our perceptions of aging aren’t static – they change as we change ourselves.
What you consider to be old changes as you become old yourself.”
The results come from a study of over half-a-million Americans.
People’s views about age change steadily: 0ver the years a person finds the age they have reached isn’t so old after all.
Older adults often find that aging can bring happiness, said Dr Chopik:
“…older adults actually have really enriching lives and some studies suggest that they’re happier than young adults.”
Many people will have to think seriously about diet and exercise if they really want to live into their 80s and 90s, as life expectancy in the US is 79.
The study was published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology (Chopik et al., 2018).
Discover the surprising colour that makes you look more attractive, the role of colour in sleep and creativity and how our emotional responses are reflected in the colours we perceive.
I have introduced a new Premium Membership level, which gives you access to regular, longer and more in-depth articles, marked with a (P).
If you are not a member of PsyBlog and find it valuable, please consider becoming a member.
If you are not a member of PsyBlog and find it valuable, please consider becoming a member.
For those of you who have yet to become members or were once members, I would invite you to consider a paid membership.
Becoming a member will remove all the ads from the site and give you access to every article marked (M) — there are 1,400+ and growing every day.
Here are just a few recent articles that are only a tiny fraction of what you will gain access to:
Each year, I invest considerable time and financial resources into the site, and for 20 years it has thrived with the unwavering support of its readers.
To those who are already members, a heartfelt thank you.
Your contributions are the reason this website endures.
For others, you can discover more about the benefits of membership by clicking here.
Thank you,
Dr Jeremy Dean
.
If you are not a member of PsyBlog and find it valuable, please consider becoming a member.
If you are not a member of PsyBlog and find it valuable, please consider becoming a member.
Every year I spend thousands of hours and dollars on PsyBlog.
For almost 20 years it has continued thanks to the support of its readers.
If you are already a member then thank you — it is because of you that this website still exists.
If you are not a member and PsyBlog is valuable to you, please consider becoming a member.
Not only does it give you access to over 1,300 members-only articles, it removes adverts from the site and makes you feel good.
You can find out more by clicking here.
Thank you,
Dr Jeremy Dean
.
Psychology it not just common sense, but do psychologists go too far in denying similarities?
Psychology it not just common sense, but do psychologists go too far in denying similarities?
If you want to see a psychologist’s head explode, tell them psychology is just common sense.
It’s not that surprising as it’s like saying that they’ve been wasting their time all these years and needn’t have bothered studying all that claptrap in the textbooks.
While psychology is, of course, more than common sense, there is certainly an intersection between the two, and anyone denying it should have their head examined.
Because psychologists are so sensitive when told their discipline is nothing more than self-evident, they’ve often gone out of their way to prove how different psychology is from common sense, sometimes with disastrous results.
An oft-cited argument against common sense pits two common sayings against each other.
For example, how is it possible to reconcile, ‘birds of a feather flock together’, with ‘opposites attract’.
Clearly these are mutually incompatible, it is argued, so common sense is (apparently) proved wrong.
Psychology to the rescue!
But the problem with this argument is pretty fundamental: it assumes that these well-known sayings are a good proxy for common sense.
In reality, they’re not.
Common sense is something much more subtle than just hackneyed old sayings.
Rather it is our intuitive sense of the way people think and behave based on all we know, both consciously and unconsciously.
Assuming common sense is just cliché is doing it a disservice.
The second argument you’ll get about the problem with common sense refers to a study carried out by Houston (1985).
Houston asked 50 random people in a local park 25 questions about psychology.
The questions had all the psychological jargon removed so that they were easily understood, but the psychological principles remained.
He found that out of 25 questions, 16 were answered correctly more often than would be expected by chance.
So, what’s your interpretation of this finding?
Does that support the idea that psychology is just common sense or not?
Well, it can just as easily be interpreted both ways.
The fact that people score above chance means they have some intuitive understanding of psychology’s findings.
On the other hand the fact that people don’t score 100% shows that people don’t know everything.
Perhaps even this is just common sense!
No, rather than attacking common sense, psychologists are much better off defending their science by explaining the multitude of counter-intuitive findings.
This blog is filled with them.
Start with, say, choice blindness, and work on from there.
These types of findings are the best evidence for how much more psychology is than just common sense.
Ultimately what really sets psychology apart from common sense is the scientific method.
Psychology tests common sense ideas about people (along with some nonsensical ideas) to try and find out the truth.
Sometimes common sense is proved right, other times not.
But, again, let’s not be too down on common sense.
While psychologists are usually sensitive and therefore defensive about the role common sense plays, they don’t need to be: in fact common sense is very important to them.
The reason for that lies at the interface between psychology and common sense.
Academic psychologists are generally pretty coy about the role common sense plays in coming up with ideas for their research.
They will talk about theory and hypotheses a lot, without really acknowledging that they just had a hunch.
What most people would call common sense plays a huge part in the early phases of psychological research.
When psychologists first consider a new area of research, there’s little else to go on other than guesswork or common sense.
And sometimes the results are exactly as we would expect and so common sense becomes science.
Of course many experiments don’t return common sense answers and often these are the most fascinating.
They can reveal the most to us about what it means to be human as well as setting up a whole line of further studies to try and hunt the answer down.
When common sense is proved wrong, though, this begs the question of how, and whether, psychological knowledge can creep across the line to become common sense.
Perhaps once psychological findings become well-known, people incorporate them into their intuitive thoughts and behaviour.
People, such as myself, who are interested in disseminating psychological research, would hope the answer is yes.
Wouldn’t it be fantastic if just understanding Milgram’s experiment on conformity really did allow us to avoid it’s more depressing consequences?
This may be far-fetched but it doesn’t hurt to consider the interaction between common sense and psychology.
After all what used to be ‘just’ psychology, can become ‘common sense’ and similarly what used to be ‘just’ common sense can become psychology.
Each should inform the other.
But, please, don’t try to tell a psychologist that psychology is just common sense.
It’s safer for all concerned.
.
Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.