Listening To Music Does NOT Boost Creativity, Study Finds

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

Many people believe that music can enhance creativity, but a recent study finds the reverse.

Instead of boosting creativity, people are less creative while listening to music, psychologists have found.

Unlike background noise, music may distract from a creative task, rather than enhance it.

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

The conclusions come from a study in which people took a standard psychological test of verbal insight.

People were given three words, such as ‘dress’, ‘dial’ and ‘flower’.

They are asked to find another single word that can be put with all three to make three new words or phrases.

[See the bottom of the article for the answer.]

The researchers then tested three different types of background music:

  1. Background music with foreign (unfamiliar) lyrics.
  2. Instrumental music without lyrics.
  3. Music with familiar lyrics.

All of these they compared to the steady, but quiet, background noise you might get in a library.

The results showed that all the different types of music — even instrumental without lyrics — impaired people’s ability on the creativity test.

Dr Neil McLatchie, study co-author, said:

“We found strong evidence of impaired performance when playing background music in comparison to quiet background conditions.”

A further study tested if it made any difference if people regularly listened to music while working and if the music put them in a better mood.

The results still showed that for creativity, it was better to work in silence or with a ‘steady state’ background noise.

The study’s authors write:

“To conclude, the findings here challenge the popular view that music enhances creativity, and instead demonstrate that music, regardless of the presence of semantic content (no lyrics, familiar lyrics or unfamiliar lyrics), consistently disrupts creative performance in insight problem solving.”

→ The answer is ‘sun’, making sundress, sundial and sunflower.

The study was published in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology (Threadgold et al., 2019).

Overcoming The Biggest Barrier To Creativity (M)

Tried and tested solutions have their place, but they also limit creativity.

Tried and tested solutions have their place, but they also limit creativity.

Keep reading with a Membership

• Read members-only articles
• Adverts removed
• Cancel at any time
• 14 day money-back guarantee for new members

Creativity Peaks At Two Different Ages

Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.

Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.

There are two peaks for creativity across the lifespan, new research finds.

One occurs — as you might imagine — in the mid-20s and a second comes later, in the mid-50s.

At least, these are the ages at which people are most likely to do the work that bags them a Nobel Prize.

Professor Bruce Weinberg, the study’s first author, said:

“Many people believe that creativity is exclusively associated with youth, but it really depends on what kind of creativity you’re talking about.”

The conclusions come from an analysis of Nobel Prize winners in Economics over the years, although Professor Weinberg thinks the results apply to creativity generally.

‘Conceptual’ innovators tended to do their best work in their 20s, the results revealed.

Experimentalists, though, were more likely to get the Nobel Prize for work done in their 50s.

Professor Weinberg said:

“Whether you hit your creative peak early or late in your career depends on whether you have a conceptual or experimental approach.”

The probable reason is that being new to a field helps conceptualists, because they are not yet bogged down with accepted views.

Experimentalists, though, need time to accumulate their findings, digging slowly, layer after layer, until they unearth the mother lode.

The same is likely true for other areas of creativity outside the sciences.

Breakthrough ideas are more likely to come from the young, but older people have more time to perfect their art.

Creative peak

Other studies have compared different disciplines to look for creative peaks.

These have generally found that scientific creativity peaks in people’s mid-30s to early 40s.

Professor Weinberg said:

“These studies attribute differences in creative peaks to the nature of the scientific fields themselves, not to the scientists doing the work.

Our research suggests than when you’re most creative is less a product of the scientific field that you’re in and is more about how you approach the work you do.”

The study was published in the journal De Economist (Weinberg & Galenson, 2019).

A Tiny Dose Of This Can Unlock Creativity

It can enhance mental flexibility.

It can enhance mental flexibility.

Creativity can be unlocked by ‘microdoses’ of psychedelics, new research suggests.

Taking very small amounts of psychoactive substances, like magic mushrooms or truffles — known as ‘microdosing’ — is thought to avoid the ‘bad trip’, but still provide creative benefits.

Microdosing has become fashionable among Silicon Valley workers and others looking for a creative boost.

Now, the first study of the phenomenon suggests microdosing might be effective.

The study involved giving 36 people a microdose of psychedelic truffles (0.37g).

They were then given tests of creativity and intelligence.

The results showed that people were more creative after consuming the microdose of truffles.

Ms Luisa Prochazkova, the study’s first author, said:

“Taken together, our results suggest that consuming a microdose of truffles allowed participants to create more out-of-the-box alternative solutions for a problem, thus providing preliminary support for the assumption that microdosing improves divergent thinking.

Moreover, we also observed an improvement in convergent thinking, that is, increased performance on a task that requires the convergence on one single correct or best solution.”

However, the microdose did not affect their intelligence or analytical abilities.

Ms Prochazkova said:

“Apart from its benefits as a potential cognitive enhancement technique, microdosing could be further investigated for its therapeutic efficacy to help individuals who suffer from rigid thought patterns or behavior such as individuals with depression or obsessive-compulsive disorder.”

However, note that the study had no control group, so the results could be down to expectations: what’s usually called the placebo effect.

In other words, it is possible people believed they were going to be more creative after microdosing, and so they were.

The study was published in the journal Psychopharmacology (Prochazkova et al., 2018).

The Personality Trait Linked To Sexual Success

People with this trait had had twice as many sexual partners.

People with this trait had had twice as many sexual partners.

Creative people have twice as many sexual partners as the less creative, research finds.

The more creative a person is, the more sexual partners they have had.

Dr Daniel Nettle, the study’s first author, said:

“Creative people are often considered to be very attractive and get lots of attention as a result.

They tend to be charismatic and produce art and poetry that grabs people’s interest.

It could also be that very creative types lead a bohemian lifestyle and tend to act on more sexual impulses and opportunities, often purely for experience’s sake, than the average person would.

Moreover, it’s common to find that this sexual behaviour is tolerated in creative people. Partners, even long-term ones, are less likely to expect loyalty and fidelity from them.”

The study of 425 people compared professional artists and poets with people in non-creative fields.

They were asked about their creative activity, number of sexual partners and symptoms of schizophrenia.

The results showed that creative people had had an average of 4-10 sexual partners, while the average for others was three.

Certain aspects of personality linked to schizophrenia were also higher in creative people.

Dr Nettle thinks this hints at the purported connection between creativity and madness:

“These personality traits can manifest themselves in negative ways, in that a person with them is likely to be prone to the shadows of full-blown mental illness such as depression and suicidal thoughts.

This research shows there are positive reasons, such as their role in mate attraction and species survival, for why these characteristics are still around.”

In other words, madness, creativity and being sexy are all linked together so that these traits survive generation after generation, despite the harmful consequences of mental illness.

The study was published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B (Nettle & Clegg, 2006).

Get free email updates

Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.