Do You Believe Your Ideas Are Superior? Science Says You Might Be Right

Research shows intellectual arrogance is linked to high IQs and success. Find out the benefits and drawbacks.

Have you ever felt certain that your ideas are better than those around you?

While this confidence might be seen as arrogance, research suggests it could also be a sign of higher intelligence.

A fascinating study reveals that people who believe in their intellectual superiority tend to perform better in academic settings.

But there’s a twist—this intellectual arrogance has its pros and cons.

Confidence and Intelligence: The Surprising Link

The study found that people who exhibit confidence in their intellectual abilities often have higher IQs.

These individuals tend to agree with statements such as, “I believe my own ideas are superior to others.”

This belief isn’t just empty arrogance—it correlates with better performance on academic tests.

Professor Wade C. Rowatt, one of the study’s co-authors, explains that intellectual arrogance might stem from a clear understanding of what one knows.

This self-assurance translates into improved results in academic and cognitive tasks.

Interestingly, the intellectually arrogant are often perceived as dominating in group settings.

They are more likely to take centre stage in discussions, often being seen as extraverted and self-assured.

However, this boldness can come at a social cost.

The Double-Edged Sword of Intellectual Arrogance

While intellectually arrogant individuals may excel academically, they aren’t always well-liked.

Their peers often view them as overconfident or even domineering.

This social perception can lead to friction in group dynamics, even if their ideas are valuable.

Key findings include:

  • Higher Marks: Intellectually arrogant individuals tend to achieve better test scores.
  • Social Costs: These people are often less liked by their peers.
  • Extraverted Personalities: They are typically seen as outgoing and attention-seeking.

Despite these drawbacks, confidence in one’s intellectual abilities can be an asset in competitive environments like classrooms or workplaces.

Is Humility Overrated?

The study initially hypothesised that intellectual humility—being open to the ideas of others—would lead to better academic results.

Surprisingly, the data showed the opposite.

It was those with confidence bordering on arrogance who scored the highest.

That said, humility remains an essential quality for lifelong learning and personal growth.

Dr Benjamin R. Meagher, the study’s lead author, highlights the importance of acknowledging one’s ignorance.

He argues that humility allows individuals to learn, adapt, and value the perspectives of others.

Without it, people and groups may struggle to grow and innovate.

How Intellectual Arrogance Impacts Success

Intellectual arrogance can be both a strength and a weakness, depending on the context.

Here’s how it plays out:

  • In Academic Settings: Confidence can drive success, helping individuals excel in tests and assignments.
  • In Group Dynamics: Arrogant individuals often dominate discussions but may alienate others in the process.
  • In Learning Environments: Humility is critical for exploring new ideas and embracing diverse perspectives.

Balancing confidence with humility is key to harnessing the benefits of intellectual self-assurance while avoiding its social pitfalls.

Confidence + humility

Believing your ideas are superior might not just be arrogance—it could be a sign of higher intelligence.

This confidence can lead to academic and cognitive success, but it’s essential to remain open to learning and growth.

By pairing intellectual confidence with humility, you can maximise your potential while fostering positive relationships with others.

So, the next time you feel sure of your ideas, remember—you might just be right!

The study was published in the Journal of Research in Personality (Meagher et al., 2015).

Author: Dr Jeremy Dean

Psychologist, Jeremy Dean, PhD is the founder and author of PsyBlog. He holds a doctorate in psychology from University College London and two other advanced degrees in psychology. He has been writing about scientific research on PsyBlog since 2004.

Get free email updates

Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.